 |
In the beginning |
Starting a new writing project after two books and one article (co-written with the webmeister) isn't something that comes easily. I have lots to write and say and think about and want to write and hope to write and should write and could write but its a case of getting the head to tell the fingers to do its bidding. But thus far the head isn't behaving itself. I have my iTunes on shuffle at the moment because I can't settle on what I want to listen to, so I am getting a bit of a mixed bag - my writing is like that too. I feel like a Red Admiral, hopping around the garden but not lingering on any particular flower. If the page was a lover I would be Don Juan's reckless brother. Be that as it may, I can be a word-slut for the time being, can I not? There is nothing in the writer's toolbox that says you will write this and only this, or that and only that, rather it says, go on, dip your hand in the lucky bag, you might just find a sherbet lemon to suck on - ooh, do I remember them. I am thinking about tigers at the moment. For a paper I will be giving in Australia and I have two tiger stories to play around with. The first is:
A woman is walking along the road and she sees a man planting pebbles. How odd, she thought. 'Tell me,' she said to the man, 'why are you planting those pebbles?'
'To keep the tigers away,' he replied.
'But there are no tigers around here,' she said.
'Then it works,' said he.
The second:
A man goes into a bar and says, 'There's a tiger outside.'
'No there isn't,' replied the barman.
Just then a woman rushes in and says, 'There's a tiger outside.'
'Huh,' said the barman, 'you two are just trying it on.'
Just then the bar door opens again and a child says, 'Hey mister, is that your tiger out there?'
I have just spent the year wrestling with critcs who are all buddies in the bar, all in the same tribe, all quoting each other when talking about the tiger without questioning the logic of the first story or the veracity of the second and I found myself saying, 'well I just don't believe that.' Someone said my books will upset some in the 'tribe' but since none of them were my pals anyway - yah-boo-sucks is all I can say to that. The mathematician, G.H. Hardy once reported,
I can remember Bertrand Russell telling me of a horrible dream. He was in the top floor of the University Library, about A.D. 2100. A library assistant was going round the shelves carrying an enormous bucket, taking down books, glancing at them, restoring them to the shelves or dumping them into the bucket. At last he came to three large volumes which Russell could recognize as the last surviving copy of Principia Mathematica [written by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, 1910]. He [the library assistant] took down one of the volumes, turned over a few pages, seemed puzzled for a moment by the curious symbolism, closed the volume, balanced it in his hand and hesitated....
This says a lot about the ‘how’ of choices, the randomness without really addressing the ‘why’; the randomness is intriguing; what to include and leave out; what to keep and what to ditch, do we keep what we understand and discard what we don't, or do we keep re-reading the book to learn what we don't already know? It is all about furthering knowledge with a view to being able to choose from a position of knowing. Do I care if critics in the tribe don't like my book? Not a jot! But do I care if they ignore the books - well of course I do. Otherwise its like writing this blog that no one reads, and only another form of talking to myself. Hey And, fancy a glass of wine? Don't mind if I do! I am leaving the tribe I was never in anyway, setting the tigers free: